Legislature(1999 - 2000)
1999-01-21 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1999-01-21 Senate Journal Page 0054 SB 40 SENATE BILL NO. 40 BY THE SENATE RULES COMMITTEE BY REQUEST OF THE GOVERNOR, entitled: An Act relating to eligibility for the longevity bonus; and providing for an effective date. was read the first time and referred to the State Affairs, Health, Education and Social Services, Judiciary and Finance Committees. Fiscal notes published today from Department of Administration, Department of Health and Social Services. Zero fiscal note published today from Department of Health and Social Services. Governors transmittal letter dated January 20: Dear President Pearce: As part of my Administration's effort to reduce state spending and address our budget gap, I am reintroducing a bill that would set income limits on eligibility for the longevity bonus. These limits would be set so that only those senior citizens in upper income brackets who least rely on the bonus would no longer be eligible for the program. I asked the Twentieth Alaska Legislature to consider this proposal, and still believe it is a responsible approach to our need to cut state spending. 1999-01-21 Senate Journal Page 0055 SB 40 This bill would limit the longevity bonus to those senior citizens with gross incomes of less than $60,000 a year or, for married seniors, a combined annual gross income of $80,000. Although the 1993 amendments to the bonus statutes closed the program to any new applicants as of January 1, 1997, the savings over the next few years produced by this change are relatively small. By contrast, the plan presented in this bill would reduce program costs by about eight percent annually, equating to some $4.6 million in FY00. Another $1.6 million would be saved annually in accompanying "hold harmless" provisions of the Adult Public Assistance budget because the federal government will not count the longevity bonus against public assistance payments if the bonus carries an income restriction -- such as that contained in this bill. This proposal does not "needs base" the bonus program, which some seniors oppose believing that equates to welfare. Approximately ninety-two percent of seniors currently on the program, or more than 20,000 people, would see no change in their bonuses. The relatively high income level of $60,000 means the bonus would not be limited to just those seniors with lower incomes, but would continue to recognize the contributions of our Alaska seniors. This bill considers only income, not assets, so recipients with moderate incomes would continue to receive the bonus even if they own valuable but non-liquid assets, such as homestead property or a residence that has greatly increased in value over the years. Also, a senior made ineligible for the bonus by this law would be reinstated to the program if his or her income later dropped below the cutoff levels. This proposal is a logical approach to trimming our budget gap without terminating essential programs and services to our residents. I urge your consideration of this measure. Sincerely, /s/ Tony Knowles Governor